Please be cautious in using the transcripts.
They were created mechanically and have mostly not been checked or revised.
Here is how they were created:
This is an error-prone process.
Click here and press the right key for the next slide.
(This may not work on mobile or ipad. You can try using chrome or firefox, but even that may fail. Sorry.)
also ...
Press the left key to go backwards (or swipe right)
Press n to toggle whether notes are shown (or add '?notes' to the url before the #)
Press m or double tap to slide thumbnails (menu)
Press ? at any time to show the keyboard shortcuts
plan
1. Opinionated Introduction
2. Exercise: Evaluating Fake Proposals
3. Exercise: Your Proposal
Who are you writing for?
Potential Supervisors
Director of Graduate Studies
Interview Panels and Funding Committees
not: you
What goes into it?
.
What is the question you want to answer?
What is the answer you anticipate defending?
Why would establishing this be a significant discovery?
The Abstract
Sentences 1-2: Background
Sentences 3-4: Objectives = quetion + thesis
Sentences 5-6: Argumentative Strategy + Key Source
Sentences 7-8: Conclusions
The Proposal
Structure: same as the abstract.
Demonstrate knowledge.
Say why this department and supervisor.
Ensure consistency.
Immediate Disqualifiers
Unclear question or thesis
Lacks a single, coherent line of enquiry
Any sign of poor scholarship
Reference list errors
Any poofrreading lapse
Smells like AI
potential supervisors
quality, fit my interests + expertise, feasibility
director of graduate studies
quality, >1 potential supervisor
interview panels and funding committees
quality, fit programme, feasibility, significance
plan
1. Opinionated Introduction
2. Exercise: Evaluating Fake Proposals
3. Exercise: Your Proposal
plan
1. Opinionated Introduction
2. Exercise: Evaluating Fake Proposals
3. Exercise: Your Proposal